Every crown material on your Rx pad fixed someone else's failure. Porcelain cracked on metal until a 1962 patent matched the two. Layered zirconia chipped, so labs moved to full-contour zirconia. Knowing which problem each solved makes choosing easier.
This is part 3 of our Then and Now series. Part 1 tracked what dental care cost and part 2 who paid for it. This one follows how crowns were made, from an 1873 gold crown patent to AI-assisted design in 2026.
Key Takeaways
- John B. Beers patented a hollow gold crown in 1873 (US 144,182) to replace gold hammered onto the tooth.
- Handpiece speed jumped from 6,500 rpm, the 1950 standard, to 250,000 rpm with John Borden's Airotor, patent filed in 1957.
- The porcelain-fused-to-metal patent (US 3,052,982, 1962) matched porcelain's expansion to the alloy so thin porcelain would not crack.
- In a 2016 trial, a monolithic lithium disilicate implant crown took 54.5 minutes of lab work, against 132.5 minutes for layered zirconia on a milled model.
- A 2015 review put five-year survival of zirconia crowns at 92.1% and advised against them as a first choice. A 2026 review found 96.8% for monolithic zirconia and 97.1% for metal-ceramic.
Quick Answer
Crowns went from hammered gold to Beers' gold shell crown (1873), Land's porcelain jacket crown (1889) and lost-wax castings (Taggart, 1907). Porcelain fused to metal was patented in 1962. Duret began dental CAD/CAM work in 1971, the first chairside CEREC inlay followed in 1985, IPS e.max launched in 2005 and full-contour zirconia spread in the 2010s. A 2026 review found lithium disilicate and zirconia crowns matching metal-ceramic survival at five years.
How Were Crowns Made Before 1900?
In his patent of November 4, 1873, San Francisco dentist John B. Beers described the usual way to restore a broken-down tooth: gold condensed with a hammer until it took the tooth's shape. He called it costly, difficult and tedious, and wrote that the hammering frequently caused periosteal inflammation. His answer was a hollow gold shell shaped like a tooth, slipped over the old tooth and secured with a gold screw and cement.
Charles H. Land patented the all-porcelain "jacket" crown in 1889. Internal microcracking kept it from being strong, but after later improvements it was used extensively until the 1950s.
How Did Casting Change Crown Making After 1907?
In 1907, Chicago dentist William H. Taggart patented an apparatus for making molds to cast dental fillings (US 865,823). In his lost-wax method, a purified wax pattern is invested and heated until the wax vaporizes completely, and metal is cast into the space. Lost-wax metal copings later addressed the jacket crown's marginal fit problems, and impression, model, wax-up and casting stayed the standard metal workflow into the CAD/CAM era.
For removables, Walter Wright introduced polymethyl methacrylate (acrylic) as a denture base in 1937, and by 1946 it was one of the most used denture materials, closing the vulcanite era.
What Changed in the 1950s and 1960s?
The belt-driven handpiece of 1938 ran at about 2,000 rpm, and by 1950, 6,500 rpm was standard. In 1957, Washington, DC dentist John Borden filed a patent for the Airotor, an air-turbine handpiece with bur speeds of 250,000 rpm that, in the words of the University of the Pacific's dental museum, utterly changed the pace of the profession. The first Certified Dental Technician exams came in October 1958.
Bur speed of John Borden's Airotor, patent filed in 1957. The standard handpiece of 1950 ran at 6,500 rpm (University of the Pacific Virtual Dental Museum).
Porcelain on metal came next. Abraham Weinstein developed the porcelain-fused-to-metal crown in the late 1950s. The patent, filed in 1959 by Weinstein, Katz and Weinstein and issued September 11, 1962, names the problem: earlier low-fusing porcelains fused to gold alloys failed because of the disparity in expansion coefficients. Matching the porcelain to the alloy let a thin layer be used without cracking, though the opaque layer that hides the metal cost some esthetics.
When Did CAD/CAM Arrive?
A 2009 review credits three pioneers. Duret began in 1971 to make crowns from an optical impression, a computer design and a numerically controlled mill. Werner Mörmann in Zurich aimed at chairside ceramic restorations in a single appointment: the first CEREC inlay was made on September 19, 1985, Siemens took on production in 1986, and by June 1987 a German private practice was seating CEREC inlays at the same appointment. The third, Andersson, used CAD/CAM to make titanium copings after soaring gold prices in the early 1980s made nickel-chromium a common substitute and allergies followed. His Procera alumina core of the mid-1990s was the first CAD/CAM crown substructure, and milled zirconia frameworks came next.
How Did E.max and Monolithic Zirconia Take Over?
Ivoclar launched the IPS e.max family, including the lithium disilicate glass-ceramics IPS e.max Press and CAD, in 2005, and says more than 230 million e.max restorations have been made, based on its sales.
First-generation zirconia was strong but opaque, so it served as a framework under layered porcelain, and its long-term failure rates, mainly from chipping, ran higher than for metal-core crowns. A 2015 systematic review found 92.1% five-year survival for zirconia single crowns, more losses to veneer fractures than metal-ceramic, and concluded that zirconia crowns should not be a primary option. The fix was to stop layering: zirconia is now increasingly made in monolithic form, and newer 4Y and 5Y grades trade some strength for translucency. See our zirconia vs. e.max guide.
Crown Making Timeline, 1873 to 2026
| Year | Milestone | Why it mattered |
|---|---|---|
| 1873 | John B. Beers patents a hollow gold crown (US 144,182) | A prefabricated crown replaced gold hammered onto the tooth |
| 1889 | Charles H. Land patents the porcelain jacket crown | All-porcelain crowns, used extensively until the 1950s |
| 1907 | William H. Taggart patents lost-wax casting apparatus (US 865,823) | Castings from a wax pattern, later used for crown copings |
| 1957 | John Borden files a patent for the Airotor | 250,000 rpm, against 6,500 rpm in 1950 |
| 1962 | Porcelain-fused-to-metal patent issued (US 3,052,982) | Porcelain matched to the alloy, designed not to crack |
| 1971 | Duret begins dental CAD/CAM work | Optical impression, computer design, milled crown |
| 1985 | First CEREC chairside inlay, University of Zurich | Same-day ceramic restorations |
| Mid-1990s | Procera alumina core, the first CAD/CAM crown substructure | Opened the way to milled zirconia frameworks |
| 2005 | Ivoclar launches IPS e.max | Lithium disilicate for pressed and milled crowns |
| 2006 to 2011 | iTero (2006) and TRIOS (2011) scanners | Digital scans instead of trays and putty |
| 2010s | Monolithic (full-contour) zirconia spreads | No layered porcelain to chip |
| 2020 | FDA clears a 3D-printing resin for permanent crowns (K201668) | Printed resin becomes an option for definitive crowns |
| 2025 | AI multi-unit design in exocad DentalCAD 3.3 | Proposals for up to three adjacent crowns, per exocad |
| 2026 | Systematic review of 64 studies | Lithium disilicate and zirconia match metal-ceramic five-year survival |
What Does Crown Making Look Like in 2026?
Scans instead of trays
Cadent introduced the iTero digital impression system in 2006 and a next-generation version in 2007; the scan went to a partner lab, and Cadent milled the model. 3Shape launched TRIOS in 2011 and says it was the first powder-free intraoral scanner. See Is an Intraoral Scanner Worth It?
Printed definitive crowns
FDA has cleared 3D-printing resins for permanent crowns through 510(k): one in June 2020 (K201668), whose summary states that no clinical data were included, and another in April 2026 (K260661), whose summary lists biocompatibility and bench testing. Clearance is not long-term clinical evidence.
AI-assisted design
exocad's DentalCAD 3.3, released in October 2025, added AI-enabled design for up to three adjacent posterior crowns and three-unit posterior bridges, according to the company. A 2026 meta-analysis of 17 studies found AI-designed crowns clinically acceptable in shape, fit and occlusal contacts, with design time 25 to 50% shorter; the evidence was mostly in vitro, and technician refinement still helped in complex cases. Another 2026 in vitro study found AI saved 8 to 15 minutes per design but did not improve margins or occlusal contacts.
Then vs Now: How Long Does a Crown Take?
No reliable record says how many days a lab spent on a crown in 1920 or 1960. Trials do measure technician time, conventional versus digital.
| Workflow | Technician time |
|---|---|
| 3-unit bridge, noble metal framework by lost-wax casting, layered porcelain | 370 minutes |
| 3-unit bridge, CAD/CAM zirconia framework, layered porcelain | 217 to 262 minutes |
| Implant crown, CAD/CAM zirconia with hand-layered ceramic on a milled model | 132.5 minutes |
| Implant crown, monolithic lithium disilicate on a titanium base, no physical model | 54.5 minutes |
Bridge data: Mühlemann et al., 2019. Implant crown data: Joda and Brägger, 2016, where both workflows needed two clinical appointments. Chairside CAD/CAM was designed to need one. At our lab, the standard turnaround on most restorative cases is 5 business days, with rush options available.
Do Today's Crowns Last Longer?
Three systematic reviews of tooth-supported single crowns by the same research group show the shift. They pooled different studies, so read the trend.
| Five-year survival | 2007 review | 2015 review | 2026 review |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metal-ceramic | 95.6% | 94.7% | 97.1% |
| Reinforced glass-ceramic | 95.4% (Empress technique) | 96.6% (leucite or lithium disilicate) | 98.5% (monolithic lithium disilicate) |
| Zirconia | Not reported | 92.1% | 96.8% monolithic, 97.3% veneered |
Five-year survival of monolithic zirconia single crowns in a 2026 review of 64 studies, up from 92.1% for zirconia crowns in the 2015 review (Pjetursson et al., 2026; Sailer et al., 2015).
The 2026 review found monolithic lithium disilicate and monolithic zirconia crowns had significantly fewer ceramic fractures and chips than veneered alternatives.
Elegant Dental Laboratory
We are a full-service dental lab at 2308 McDonald Ave in Brooklyn, founded in 2007 by Gary Fingerman. More than 35 technicians make every case in our 7,000 sq. ft. facility, with no outsourcing.
- Crowns and bridges: zirconia (solid, 9-layer, solid with buccal porcelain, coping with layered porcelain), IPS e.max, PFM in base and precious alloys, and implant restorations.
- Turnaround and warranty: 5 business days standard on most restorative cases, rush options available; up to a 7-year warranty on final restorations and up to 20 years on screw-retained implant abutments. See policies and warranties.
- Getting cases to us: digital scans are reviewed before production (submit a digital case). Our own drivers pick up cases in the New York area (call to confirm availability), and we provide UPS shipping labels for practices anywhere. Send a case or call 877-335-5221.
More From the Then and Now Series
- Part 4: Dentures in America, Then and Now: From Hippopotamus Ivory to Digital Dentures
- Part 5: The American Dental Lab, Then and Now: From Back Rooms to Digital Workflows
Related guide: Types of Zirconia Explained: 3Y, 4Y, 5Y, Multilayer, Monolithic and Layered.
FAQ
When was the gold crown patented?
John B. Beers of San Francisco received US patent 144,182 on November 4, 1873, for a hollow gold crown.
When was the porcelain-fused-to-metal crown invented?
Abraham Weinstein developed it in the late 1950s. The patent, US 3,052,982, was filed in 1959 and issued on September 11, 1962.
Are all-ceramic crowns as durable as PFM now?
For lithium disilicate and zirconia, yes at five years. A 2026 review found 98.5% survival for monolithic lithium disilicate, 96.8% for monolithic zirconia and 97.1% for metal-ceramic single crowns.
Are 3D-printed permanent crowns FDA cleared?
Some printing resins are cleared for permanent crowns, including K201668 (2020) and K260661 (2026), based on non-clinical testing rather than long-term clinical trials.
Does AI design crowns now?
It proposes designs. Studies show 25 to 50% shorter design time, mostly in vitro, and technicians still refine margins and occlusion.
Sources (27)
- Beers JB. Improvement in artificial crowns for teeth. US Patent 144,182, November 4, 1873. Google Patents
- Helvey GA. A history of dental ceramics. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31(4). compendiumlive.com
- Stephens C. A brief history of the development and use of vulcanised rubber in dentistry. Br Dent J. 2023;234(8):607-610. doi:10.1038/s41415-023-5735-7
- Taggart WH. Apparatus for making molds for the casting of dental fillings and the like. US Patent 865,823, September 10, 1907. Google Patents
- Alqutaibi AY, et al. Polymeric denture base materials: a review. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(15):3258. doi:10.3390/polym15153258
- National Board for Certification in Dental Laboratory Technology. History, regulation and organization in dental laboratory technology. nbccert.org
- University of the Pacific, Virtual Dental Museum. A dynamic decade: speeding up the handpiece. dentalmuseum.pacific.edu
- Weinstein M, Katz S, Weinstein AB. Fused porcelain-to-metal teeth. US Patent 3,052,982, September 11, 1962. Google Patents
- Miyazaki T, et al. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44-56. doi:10.4012/dmj.28.44
- Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137 Suppl:7S-13S. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0398
- Dental Asia. CEREC inventor Prof. Dr. Dr. Werner Mörmann turns 75. November 14, 2016. dentalasia.net
- Reiss B. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. Int J Comput Dent. 2006;9(1):11-22. PubMed 16608051
- Otto T. Up to 27-years clinical long-term results of chairside Cerec 1 CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20(3):315-329. PubMed 28852748
- Ivoclar. IPS e.max celebrates its 20th anniversary. Media release, March 24, 2025. ivoclar.com
- Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Novel zirconia materials in dentistry. J Dent Res. 2018;97(2):140-147. doi:10.1177/0022034517737483
- Orthodontic Products. Cadent debuts new iTero digital impression system at ADA annual session. October 1, 2007. orthodonticproductsonline.com
- 3Shape. The 3Shape story: who we are. 3shape.com
- US Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) summary K201668 (resin for 3D-printed permanent crowns, inlays, onlays and veneers), June 23, 2020. accessdata.fda.gov
- US Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) summary K260661 (printable resin for definitive crowns), April 15, 2026. accessdata.fda.gov
- Inside Dental Technology. Exocad releases DentalCAD 3.3 Chemnitz with enhanced implant and AI capabilities. October 28, 2025. insidedentaltech.com
- Holiel AA, et al. Accuracy and functional performance of artificial intelligence-based automated crown design systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Eng Comput Biol. 2026;17:11795972261463709. doi:10.1177/11795972261463709
- Gonçalves LFF, et al. In vitro evaluation of automated single-unit crown design using artificial intelligence. J Dent. 2026;173:106755. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2026.106755
- Mühlemann S, et al. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):252-257. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.020
- Joda T, Brägger U. Time-efficiency analysis of the treatment with monolithic implant crowns in a digital workflow: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(11):1401-1406. doi:10.1111/clr.12753
- Pjetursson BE, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18 Suppl 3:73-85. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01467.x
- Sailer I, et al. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater. 2015;31(6):603-623. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011
- Pjetursson BE, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, failure, and complication rates of metal-ceramic, veneered, and monolithic all-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns, Part 1. Int J Prosthodont. 2026;39(3):308-324. doi:10.11607/ijp.9633
Then and Now series by Elegant Dental Laboratory, Brooklyn, New York. Reviewed by Gary Fingerman, founder and CEO. Last reviewed: September 27, 2026.
